Insights

Some Books I Really Enjoyed In 2011

I read sixty books in 2011, counting novels and short story collections and graphic novels and audiobooks (yes, I do count listening to a book the same as reading a book). I enjoyed many of those books. Below are the books that I really enjoyed, in no particular order except in which I read/listened to them. Novels:

  • BEAT THE REAPER by Josh Bazell
  • THE CARETAKER OF LORNE FIELD by Dave Zeltserman
  • SWAMPLANDIA! by Karen Russell
  • EVERY SHALLOW CUT by Tom Piccirilli
  • EMILY, ALONE by Stewart O’Nan
  • RUN by Blake Crouch
  • THE HUNGER GAMES by Suzanne Collins
  • FUN AND GAMES by Duane Swierczynski
  • THE GROVE by John Rector
  • BREAKFAST OF CHAMPIONS by Kurt Vonnegut
  • READY PLAYER ONE by Ernest Cline
  • DEATH WISHING by Laura Ellen Scott
  • THE IMPERFECTIONISTS by Tom Rachman (under novels, but it's really a novel-in-stories)

Stories:

  • MAD TO LIVE by Randall Brown
  • STORIES FOR NIGHTTIME AND SOME FOR THE DAY by Ben Loory

Audiobooks:

  • THE ART OF RACING IN THE RAIN by Garth Stein, read by Christopher Evan Welch
  • 61 HOURS by Lee Child, read by Dick Hill
  • WORTH DYING FOR by Lee Child, read by Dick Hill
  • FEAST DAY OF FOOLS, by James Lee Burke, read by Will Patton

Nonfiction:

  • MICROSTYLE: THE ART OF WRITING LITTER by Christopher Johnson

(I'm also currently reading 11/22/63 by Stephen King, about only 200 pages in. It's good so far, and practically everyone who has read it says it's amazing, and while it might be, I won't prematurely add it to the list. Hopefully it will be on next year's list.)

Note: I also purposely made sure there were more male authors on this list so that it creates a big hoopla that will occupy people's minds for a few days and then dissipate as they become enraged at something else just as asinine. (Okay, not really.)

So how about you? What books did you read this year that you really enjoyed?

Confession Time

It's about time I came clean about something rather important. Don't worry -- I'm not admitting to any major crimes ... yet. But I want to tell you about the first novel I self-published nearly a year ago. Wait, some of you might be thinking. A year ago? But you published The Calling in April.

And right you would be.

The Calling was the first novel I published under my own name.

Before that, I published a novel under a different name.

Some eagle-eyed readers probably already figured it out. Honestly, I didn't really do much to try to hide the fact.

What fact, you might be asking?

Quite simply that I wrote this book:

Yes, that's right. I am Z. Constance Frost. Or Z. Constance Frost is me. Either way, I'm the author of No Shelter.

Surprise!

As I explained during last night's two live readings, the entire thing was meant to be an experiment that didn't go very well. You see, I wrote No Shelter years ago. In fact, in the spring of 2009 when the whole Hint Fiction thing came about, my agent was shopping around No Shelter. He was sending it out under a pen name, because that's what I requested. I knew I wanted to do a female assassin series, but I figured since it would be a straight series (five or seven or however many books) it would be best to put them under a different name, as the books I planned (hoped) to publish under my own name would be different standalone novels. Besides, the series is about a female assassin, so who better to author the books than a female writer?

And so, after some creative thinking, Z. Constance Frost was born.

I liked the name. My agent liked the name. It has a distinct ring to it that definitely sticks in a reader's head, and that was what I was going for.

But, as usual, though there were several nibbles from publishers, nobody took a bite, and so into the digital drawer the book went.

Until late 2010 when I started to seeing the disturbing trend in publishing and saw some other authors having success self-publishing their work digitally, and I thought about No Shelter and figured why not. Besides, I saw this as a great opportunity to pull a Richard Bachman.

If you're unaware, Stephen King in his early career published four novels under the pen name Richard Bachman (five, I guess, counting Thinner, though that was the book that eventually made the whole truth come to light, and besides, I don't believe King was really trying to hide the fact he was the true author in that book to begin with). King's publisher was afraid he would oversaturate the market with his own work, so they released the novels under the pen name. It was a big secret. Nobody really knew King was Bachman, unlike nowadays when everyone knows J. D. Robb is really Nora Roberts (also nowadays publishers don't give a shit about over-saturation as long as it sells).

You see, it was a marketing thing. Dean Koontz used to do the same, publishing works in different genres under different names. Only, from what I understand, Koontz decided in the end it was a bad idea, and, I'm assuming, can become confusing for readers who begin to become fans of one particular author, even though that author isn't real.

Had No Shelter sold, the publisher might have gone ahead and published it under the pen name, but would have wanted me to make it clear that I was the actual author. After all, somebody has to help market the thing, and as we've discussed before, it almost always falls on the author's shoulders.

So when I realized I could self-publish it, the fact that practically nobody had to know the truth was appealing. I created a blog, as well as Gmail and Facebook and Twitter accounts, and pretended to be this single mother of two living just outside of Washington, D.C. It was going to be fun.

And it was fun, at first. But the truth is it's hard enough trying to focus on writing for and promoting just one writer -- namely me -- let alone writing for and promoting another writer -- like, you know, Z. Constance Frost. Just how do you get the word out about a very new writer? I did a post here last year, which even included an interview with Z. Constance Frost. She in turn interviewed me at her website for my blog tour of The Calling. I included an excerpt from her book in the back of my book, and she included an excerpt from my book in the back of her book. Sometimes she would even leave comments here on this website (!).

Cute? Clever? Pathetic? Asinine?

No matter what you call it, it was exhausting.

As I began to make more sales and money with my own books, I began to spend less time keeping Z. Constance Frost alive. I wanted to start working on another Holly Lin novel, but the truth was the sales for No Shelter were so low that I didn't see much point. It made more sense to keep promoting myself, as my books had started selling well. Maybe if Frost had more books out there would be more sales, but as it is No Shelter has sold just over 300 copies for the year, with the e-book being priced between 99 cents and $2.99. Compare that do The Serial Killer's Wife or The Calling, both which have already sold over 400 units each this month alone, and you'll see my problem.

I wish things could have been different, truly. I wish Z. Constance Frost could continue living her imaginary life with her imaginary children (hell, No Shelter is even dedicated to her children!). I wish I could keep this secret going for the next couple of years, as more and more Holly Lin books became available and "she" grew a bigger readership (nay, fan base!) and then, at the peak, I would somehow let it slip that it was me.

But, alas, it was not meant to be.

Z. Constance Frost's byline will remain on No Shelter until later this year when the second book comes out. Then No Shelter gets a new cover and Z. Constance Frost will be no more.

Which is sad.

I was really getting to like her, despite the fact she was apparently a pretty slow writer.

But, in all honesty, her two kids are complete brats.

Anyway, so this is my confession. The truth is out now. Not sure if it was the best way to "out" myself, though I don't think there's proper etiquette when it comes to something like this. But now you all know my dirty little secret, the time I tried to pull a Richard Bachman.

Which is not to say that, who knows, I might not try it again at some point down the line.

Only time will tell.

For now, do yourself a favor if you haven't already -- go check out No Shelter.

From what I hear, it's a pretty good yarn.

The Importance Of Reviews

As I mentioned a long time ago, I'm usually a three-star kind of reader. This isn't a bad thing at all -- it simply means I like the book or collection or whatever.

Four stars means I really like it.

Five stars means I love it so much, I wish I would have written it.

Of course, many people -- writers in particular -- aren't too fond of the three-star review, even if it doesn't mean the reader (such as myself) disliked the book ... and, as you can imagine, they are even less fond of the two- and one-star reviews.

But, as John Scalzi once taught us, it's good for writers to embrace bad reviews. After all, nobody's work is ever universally loved, so why should yours be any different?

People oftentimes dismiss Amazon reviews as having no real importance -- I know I've done it in the past -- but the truth is they're very important. Sure, potential readers might not be swayed one way or another -- they might instead decide to read the book based on the author or cover art or product description or whatever -- but the star rating on Amazon is crucial.

Why?

Well, my friends, because of Amazon's mysterious and almighty algorithm.

How it works it beyond anyone, but the simple truth is that once a book gets in the system and starts being recommended more and more to readers, more and more sales occur. It's a fun ride, let me tell you. But, just like with anything, the ride can stop in the snap of a finger (which, by the way, doesn't really make sense, as you need two fingers to snap together ... right?).

A friend of mine had an e-book priced at $4.99 which was selling very well for several months. In fact, he was bringing in about a grand every month from that particular book. Then, all of a sudden, the sales trickled and he started making maybe $300 at the most from the book.

So what happened?

Well, before the sales stopped, he had one five-star review for the book. Then someone gave his book a one-star review (which is suspect, because the reviewer had never reviewed anything before then and hasn't reviewed anything since).

Is it that readers suddenly stopped buying the book based on that one-star review? Or is it that the book just wasn't being recommended as much as it had been because of the new review?

The answer could be a little bit of both, but I'm leaning more toward the latter. You see, not too long ago I read this post about writing Amazon reviews for Dummies. It's interesting stuff, but the one thing that really stuck out to me was number eight on the list (the bold is mine):

Anything less than 4 stars means “NOT RECOMMENDED.” Don’t expect an author to be pleased with 2 or 3 stars, no matter how much you rave in the text. Those stars are the primary way a book is judged. Without a 4 or 5 star rating, a book doesn’t get picked up in the Amazon algorithms for things like “also bought” suggestions. Giving 1 or 2 stars to a book that doesn’t have many reviews is taking money out of the author’s pocket, so don’t do it unless you really think the author should take up a new line of work.

To be honest, before I read that post and saw that one line, I hadn't really thought much about Amazon's algorithm. Obviously I knew it was there and that it was useful, but I wasn't aware of just how important it really was.

However, I experienced my own fallout from the Amazon's algorithm just this past week. The Serial Killer's Wife, which so far had six five-star reviews, had been selling on average twenty units a day for the past few months. Those numbers add up, as you can imagine. Then I noticed the book had gotten a new review, which was a four-star review when I first saw it, then when I looked later it had been changed to a three-star review. The reviewer actually gave the book three-and-a-half stars, and even went so far as to recommend it to readers despite having a few issues with the third-half of the book.

But that didn't matter.

Within the course of a day the sales slowed to maybe ten, and maintained that average for the course of the next several days. Before, The Serial Killer's Wife's ranking had bounced between 2,500 and 4,000, almost always staying in the tail end of the Kindle top 100 paid horror titles. Then it fell down below 5,000 and hasn't yet regained a higher position.

Well, some might be saying, that's what you get for self-publishing the book.

Actually, no. The algorithm doesn't differentiate between self-published and traditionally-published titles. At least I don't believe it does. And if you view the top 100 titles for any genre, you will see a wide varieties of self- and traditionally-published titles, as well as a wide range of star ratings.

So what does it all mean? That, believe it or not, reviews on Amazon are actually a big thing. It's scary to think that a book selling very well could suddenly stop selling altogether at the snap of a finger (are we not counting the thumb as a finger? because if so I guess that would make sense then), but that's how it happens.

But not many readers actually post reviews on Amazon. They're more apt to post reviews on Goodreads instead. I know I very rarely post reviews on Amazon, but that's because, again, I'm usually a three-star reader, and I know that rating a book three stars on Amazon wouldn't be helpful to the author even if it meant I enjoyed the book.

My point in all this? Well, if you really enjoy a book and tell your friends or even mention it on your blog or Facebook or Twitter or whatever, consider also posting a quick review on Amazon. The more five and four star reviews, the more chance the book has to reach an even wider audience.

Which is not to say I'm endorsing the whole writer-to-writer circle jerk: If you give my book five stars, I'll give your book five stars. That's a disgusting and immoral practice that doesn't help anyone in the end: not the reader, not the writer, and not the reviewer.

Granted, if you feel compelled to post reviews with a lower star rating, that's certainly okay too. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from posting a low-rated review. Every year I read numerous books I don't care much for and could easily give them one or two stars. But as I writer I know how damaging those can be, so I personally try to refrain from posting them, at least on Amazon.

In fact, I'm going to make it a plan in the next year to try to start posting more reviews on Amazon for the books I really enjoy. After all, if I enjoyed a book enough to say so on Goodreads (and sometimes even here on this blog), why can't I take an extra minute and also say so on Amazon? It just might help the author sell a few more books. And in a world where fewer and fewer people are reading, every little bit helps.

P.S. On a completely different note, remember that I'm doing a live reading on this site tomorrow evening, both at 7 pm EST and 7 pm PST, so no excuses to miss out!

Mamatas On Writing

The First 10,000

At some point over the weekend -- Saturday evening, thereabouts -- I sold my 10,000th ebook for the year on Kindle and Nook (Smashwords and Sony and iBooks brought in a handful more). That doesn't count the over 30,000 free downloads earlier this year for The Silver Ring, either. Is that a big accomplishment?

Well, it's something at least.

The Hint Fiction anthology itself has sold over 13,000 copies since its release last year. Of course, it was through a well-known publisher and got really nice reviews from some major places. My ebooks were released by just me and, while they were reviewed at some much appreciated blogs, the marketing reach was nothing compared to, say, being interviewed on NPR.

In fact, releasing your own ebooks makes it even that much harder to get reviewed. And it's funny, if you think about it, because what's the difference between me releasing the books or a friend of mine? Every day, it seems, someone buys a new domain to start their own publishing company, and people submit their manuscripts without really understanding why except for the simple fact that they want to be published. And for what, exactly? What, ultimately, differentiates a book released by so-and-so and a book released by, well, me?

Keep in mind, I'm not talking about major presses, or even smaller presses -- at least nine times out of ten there's distribution that will get you into bookstores, even if they are fading away, but at least it's something.

What I'm talking about, instead, are the micro presses set up by people like you and me. I could set one up tomorrow, in fact, and open submissions, and people would submit (see above), and then I would accept a few and publish them somewhere down the line and those books, baby, those would be published.

Right?

Over the weekend Michael Martone was in the area doing a reading at Elizabethtown College. I went and enjoyed the reading immensely and talked to him afterward about this and that. At some point he asked how Phantom Energy -- the collection he had blurbed -- was selling. I just smiled and told him it was selling as well as you'd expect a flash fiction collection to sell. After all, I had gone ahead with the project knowing that it wasn't going to sell well, at least not initially. The audience, for the most part, are the writers who enjoy very short fiction, and nine times out of ten those writers carry that elitist attitude that it must be published to be of any quality (e.g., not done by the author himself, which is why a few flash fiction collections published by well known micro presses do fabulously). Even with the great blurbs from Michael Martone and Ben Loory, and the fact that pretty much every story in the collection was previously published in well respected journals (both online and print), and that even some of the stories were finalists or runners-up for contests or awards, the fact that I released it myself makes it pretty much impossible for the collection to be reviewed at any semi-well known book review website.

And, quite honestly, I don't really care.

The reason I mention this is that the majority of my ebook sales come from that hideous and reprehensible genre we refer to as, well, genre. The Serial Killer's Wife and The Calling are my best selling novels to date, and they are, respectively, a straight thriller and a supernatural thriller. Would a literary novel of mine be selling as well as those two? Highly doubtful.

A recent essay at The Millions talks about reasons to not self-publish. The piece, unsurprisingly, comes across rather elitist. But that's because there's a huge canyon between literary readers and writers and genre readers and writers (though yes, there are oftentimes those, such as myself, who like to straddle the canyon). The arguments placed in the essay are good arguments, but they lend themselves more toward the literary side of things (hence, the author's second reason for not self-publishing: "I Write Literary Fiction").

Though some of the other reasons the author gives, such as "I’d Prefer a Small Press to a Vanity Press" and "Self-Publishing is Better for the Already-Published," come across, to me at least, as fallacies. Because at this point it almost seems like writers decide to go with publishers for the vanity. They want to impress their friends, who are ... yes, class? That's right -- writers themselves. And honestly, there's nothing wrong with that. If that's what they want to do, that's what they want to do. But they shouldn't kid themselves thinking they aren't, even by a small stretch, doing it for vanity sake.

And, finally, is self-publishing better for the already-published? Um, I guess. But you know what? I'm doing just fine self-publishing, and I haven't really been published before. Some authors who have been published before and who are doing self-publishing aren't finding any success. That's just the way the cookie crumbles, so to speak.

Personally, I'm starting to get tired hearing everyone talking in circles. Writers defending traditional publishing and writers defending self-publishing. It goes on and on, and in the end, nothing will ever change.

So what, pray tell, is the point?

I honestly don't know.

But it's all become noise, and as a pre New Years Resolution, I plan to distance myself from all that noise. My sales continue to steadily increase every month (which I hope they continue doing), so I'm quite happy with where I am right now. And so I'll continue to write and I'll continue to publish and I'll look forward to my next 10,000 sales, which will hopefully lead to 100,000 sales, and so on.

After all, I'm not here to debate.

I'm here to write.