Insights

And So It Begins

For the past few years I've come to believe that the days of the mass market paperback were limited. I mean, look at what happened to Leisure. With more and more readers adopting ereaders and purchasing ebooks that are priced just as much as the paperbacks (sometimes even less, but sometimes even more), publishers will eventually accept that they're losing more money than usual on these paperbacks and decide to go strictly digital. So it was no real surprise to see this today:

As e-books continue to capture more readers that had read mass market paperbacks, Simon & Schuster is re-launching its Pocket Star mass market line as an e-book only imprint. According to the company, “Pocket Star will continue to feature bestselling and debut authors in popular genres including women’s fiction, romance, thrillers, urban fantasy, and mystery.” The revised imprint will feature a mix of new and old title, with the majority being new.

Louise Burke, executive v-p and publisher of Pocket, was clear that she expects the e-book Pocket Star imprint to serve in much the same way the mass market version did in the book ecosystem. “Similar to how mass market has served as a platform to develop future hardcover authors, it is our mission to use Pocket Star’s new digital-only format to establish new voices in the marketplace. An eBook imprint is flexible, cost-effective, cutting-edge and makes sense in today’s marketplace. Under the Pocket Star banner we will publish original works including full-length novels and novellas from some of our most popular authors,” Burke said. Price points will vary according to the work.

And this, my friends, is only the beginning. Soon the rest of the major publishers will create strictly digital imprints. Hell, Dutton has already started doing just that.

Now let the unanimous cry begin: But what about the bookstores???

Well, what about them? Publishers don't care about bookstores, not when those bookstores aren't making them money. If publishers can make even more money going strictly digital, then they're going to go strictly digital. It's an unpopular opinion, I know, but writers need to look out for themselves. Meaning yes, we all want to support bookstores, but quite honestly, do the bookstores really give a shit about you? Some do, sure -- some have great relationships with authors and do what they can to help promote those authors, and that's great. But the majority are looking at the bottom line, and that bottom line is all that matters. So if your book doesn't sell, well then it's goodbye, see you never, no hard feelings.

What I would be most interested to see in regards to today's announcement is just what terms these Pocket Star ebook authors will get. I'm assuming (or halfheartedly hoping) that the terms are better than the standard 25%. But something tells me that might not be the case. After all, it's a proven fact that publishers will try to get away with as much as they can to screw over authors.

But let's assume Pocket Star is offering at least 50% royalties. Okay, that's not bad, even after the agent gets his 15%. You could get 70% doing it on your own, but again, 50% isn't bad if you don't have to worry about editing and formatting and cover art. But is it worth signing all your rights away? Is it worth giving up all your creative control? It is worth knowing the ebook will most likely be overpriced and won't sell nearly as much as it could if it were competitively priced?

For some authors, the answer will be yes, yes, yes. Some authors shouldn't have any input in their creative control, because let's be honest -- just because you can write doesn't mean you know what good cover art looks like, even if it slapped you across the face. And let's face it -- many authors still want that validation of having their work "vetted" by a major publisher. They don't care that they could make more money doing it themselves by reaching the same amount of readers. They just want to be able to impress their friends. And you know what? That's their decision. There's nothing wrong with it. Me, well, you know how I feel about it, but that's beside the point. The point here is that Pocket Star going strictly digital is just the beginning. I can't wait to see who joins the bandwagon next.

Becoming That Author

Today's podcast is a doozy, folks. I talk about a lot of stuff happening in publishing. Namely how Target will soon stop carrying the Kindle, why smart authors are cutting out Amazon, and Paulo Coelho selling many of his ebooks for just 99 cents. I'll also talk about The Dark Tide by Andrew Gross, and get deep and personal with what I mean when I say I don't want to become that author (all while experimenting with intro and outro music, which still needs the kinks worked out of it, so bear with me). Well? Why are you still reading?

Listen!

Becoming That Author

Speaking Of Podcasting

Last month the Garden State Horror Writers were crazy kind enough to have me come speak at their monthly meeting. What's more, they recorded the meeting for their members who could not attend. Normally these podcasts are kept behind the GSHW's Members Only section, but they graciously gave me permission to share mine here. Not surprisingly, I went over my allotted time of an hour -- I just had too much to talk about! -- but Neil Morris was able to edit it down to exactly sixty minutes. Unfortunately, WordPress wouldn't let me upload the entire thing as the file was too large, so I had to break it down into four sections. Enjoy.

GSHW Part 1

GSHW Part 2

GSHW Part 3

GSHW Part 4

In Case You Didn't Already Hear

This is no doubt the biggest publishing news of the day, if not the entire week:

Microsoft Corp. is investing at least $605 million in Barnes & Noble Inc.'s Nook digital-book business, as the software giant pushes deeper into the e-books business and props up a rival to the iPad and Amazon's Kindle.

Microsoft will have a 17.6% stake in a new subsidiary for the Nook and Barne's college-text businesses in a transaction that values them at $1.7 billion, the companies said. That compares with Barnes & Noble's current market capitalization of about $791 million and could fuel the argument of some analysts and investors that the digital business should be separated from the retail division.

Shares of Barnes & Noble, which has struggled with a slide in traditional book sales and heavy investments in its Nook digital business, surged 68% on the news.

As those shares should. After all, this is MAJOR news. Since January Barnes & Noble has talked about possibly doing a spinoff of the NOOK. Just last week there were rumors circulating around that Facebook might (or should) be the one to make the purchase. After all, they recently threw down some massive dough to purchase a photo app that I don't use and have no interest in using.

Anyway, is this Microsoft/Barnes & Noble news exciting? Yes, very much so. Though, to be honest, I don't care much for either company. Growing up all I used was Microsoft, but in the past few years I've become a big Apple fan. I have an iMac, an iPad, an iPhone, ietc. As for a dedicated ereader, I love my basic $79 Kindle. I can't remember the last time I was in a Barnes & Noble, and I really have no interest in any of the NOOK devices, though the most recent one -- the glow in the dark eink -- looks pretty cool. So as a consumer, this news today doesn't really affect me much ... except, in a way, it does.

Because the more competition, the better.

If a powerhouse like Microsoft is teaming up with Barnes & Noble, it gives Amazon more reason to keep their prices low -- and, more importantly, it gives them more reason to continue to offer writers such as myself that 70% royalty ... just as it gives B&N the same reason to keep up their 65% royalty.

See -- competition is great for everyone involved.

Then again, some companies feel the need to flex their muscle, which ends up hurting pretty much everyone involved.

Oh well, such is life.

Speaking of Reader Reviews

Earlier this week I talked about what I'm calling the Reader Blurb (I literally talked about it -- with my own voice!), and now here there's this:

Would you buy a book if it was like other books you bought and you knew others who bought what you liked to buy bought that book, too?

The answer to that convoluted question is one of the open secrets of Amazon’s success in the e-tail business: Once you’ve sold products to consumers at low prices and shipped them at little cost, suggest they buy another product – but not just any product, a product selected just for them by a complicated algorithm based on what they’ve searched, bought and otherwise shown interest in.

Consumers love it.

Of course, these consumers are fairly skeptical about some things, which they very well should be:

Consumers aren’t so much worried about whether Amazon rigs its own system; they’re worried about a different kind of foul play – by authors.

“I used to trust book recommendations until I saw how authors and self-help gurus were using the ratings system to boost their sales,” said Nicole Guillaume, 32, the owner of a dog-training company in Corona, Calif.

According to Guillaume, a well-known self-help expert emailed her asking for “help” on Amazon in the form of a book review on the day her book came out. Hundreds of people immediately responded with five-star reviews, despite the unlikelihood of them actually owning the book since it just came out that day. A few weeks later, another author tried the same thing with Guillaume and had similar, positive results.

“I am disgusted with such ploys,” said Guillaume. “I understand that these experts and authors want to increase their sales, but the rating system was created so that real people could create real reviews. Having people create reviews of books they’ve never read totally defeats the purpose.”

This is, of course, a very serious problem. So what can we do about it? Who knows. As a writer, I obviously would like as many positive reviews as possible. I even encourage readers to leave reviews -- honest reviews. If they really liked the book, great. If they didn't, well, hopefully they'll like the next one. Many readers, I think, understand the importance of reviews, so if they don't care for a particular book, they just won't review it.

You have to take the book reviews “with a grain of salt,” said Jay Buerck, 29, from St. Louis and the chief operating officer for an online reputation management company.

“If the book only has a few reviews and all of the reviews are five stars and overly positive testimonials about how great the book is, I tend to discount the reviews,” he said.

A friend of mine has said he would actually prefer to get four-star reviews over five-star reviews, and I think that makes sense. I'm a cynical person by nature, so if I stumble across a book with a ton of five-star reviews, a red flag immediately shoots up (note: that doesn't mean I would prefer four-star reviews over five-star reviews, because obviously I would prefer the five-star, but you see what I mean, right?).

Again, reader reviews are great for helping potential readers decide whether or not to check out the book, but they also play a major role in Amazon's algorithm. It could be completely coincidental, but in the past few days, since that one-star review, I've seen my sales start to slip for my novella Spooky Nook. Again, it could be coincidental, but I don't think so. I also don't think readers are totally turned away by that one-star review. Instead, potential readers aren't being recommended the book as much as before that review entered the system and changed the algorithm. Scary thought, huh? Well, yes and no. The thing is, there's really nothing you can do about it. You can't predict sales. Even without that one-star review, sales might eventually start slipping. After all, what goes up must come down. It's completely out of my control. The only thing I can do is work hard on the next book. That, my friends, is very much in my control.

*  *  *

Now, on a completely different note, I'm including this YouTube clip. It's pretty longish but worth watching (or at least listening to). While a large number of teachers are underpaid and overworked and still do a great job, there are others who are completely disgusting in how they deal with students -- especially those students with special needs. So check out the video. Just be warned, it will piss you off.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfkscHt96R0]