Rants

The Tale Of Two Roberts

Like any narcissistic blogger in the 21st century, I have Google Alerts set up for "robert swartwood" and "hint fiction." Oftentimes, these two alerts go hand in hand, though, interestingly enough, in the past few months my name has become less and less associated with Hint Fiction to the point where HF is now becoming its own thing. Sometimes, though, when one of those alerts for "hint fiction" pops up, it will also mention me or, I should say, my evil twin brother Robert Smartwood. I'm anal about my name, just like many people are anal about their names (don't believe me, ask Roxanne Gay). All too often my last name will be misspelled. But shit happens. Still, I wondered what I would find if I Googled "robert smartwood." Unsurprisingly, a good bit came up, the highlights of which I'd like to share. Back on October 29, 2009, the Book Smugglers reviewed the horror anthology Fifty-Two Stitches edited by Aaron Polson. Here's a bit of what the reviewer had to say:

Reading each “stitch” in this book, I came to a (in retrospect, a pretty “duh” moment) realization – writing flash fiction is HARD. I’ve read and reviewed my share of horror anthologies and first novels, and many authors tend to make the same mistakes: wasted, powerless adjectives, descriptions that are lengthy and try too hard at gruesome, for example. But in the flash fiction of Fifty-Two Stitches, there’s simply no space to make these mistakes. Each sentence, each word has to be selected for maximum effectiveness – and the result is all the better for it. As in all anthologies, Fifty-Two Stitches has some duds and unevenness, but there are also some memorable, truly awesome stories within as well. Some of these gems include “New Woman” by Doug Murano (in which a man used to taking charge on dates gets more than he can handle), “In the Garden” and “Mother’s Love” by L.R. Bonehill (both eerie, haunting stories about mothers dealing with loss), “Sitting Up With Grandpa” by Blu Gilliand (where a young boy sits vigil with his recently deceased Grandpa), and “Dead Weight” by Robert Smartwood (a story that gives a whole new meaning to coyotes and border crossing).

Back on April 19, 2010, Dark Sky Magazine did a "Recommended Readings From Online Magazines" and was kind enough to excerpt a paragraph from my story "The Cigarette Tree":

– That summer he went to stay with his grandmother. She smoked constantly. He hated the way she smelled and sounded when she talked, and he knew smoking would kill her, so one day he stole his grandmother’s carton of cigarettes she kept up on top of the refrigerator—he had to balance himself on a chair to do this—and then he took the carton out to the garden in the backyard. He dug a hole, threw the carton inside, filled the hole back in, and patted it down like nothing was out of place. — Robert Smartwood in Staccato Fiction

And there are a few others, mostly people mentioning one of several Hint Fiction contests and then mentioning my evil twin brother Robert Smartwood too, but the real doozy and major fail of them all is Borders.com who, despite frequent requests from my publisher, still has my name misspelled. Which explains why I never listed Borders as a possible place to pre-order the anthology. Hell, I don't even have it listed as one of the sites to pre-order from on the Hint Fiction page. And honestly? Borders isn't even giving you a discount if you order from the site (not even 1% off), so do everyone involved a favor and just don't order from them! Instead, order here, or here, or here, or here, or here, or here, or even here. But just not here.

Publishers Weekly Presents The Who's Who Of Self-Publishing

So apparently Publishers Weekly -- who I used to have quite a bit of respect for -- has decided to "embrace the self-publishing phenomenon" and create a "quarterly supplement announcing self-published titles and reviewing those we believe are most deserving of a critical assessment." But wait -- there's more!

This whole shebang costs you only $149! (You could buy a new Kindle for less than that.) Of course, some of the e-books submitted will be reviewed. It's not like you're paying to have your stuff reviewed. PW would never lower themselves to that, would they?

We briefly considered charging for reviews, but in the end preferred to maintain our right to review what we deemed worthy. The processing fee that guarantees a listing and the chance to be reviewed accomplishes what we want: to inform the trade of what is happening in self-publishing and to present a PW selection of what has the most merit.

Ah, yes, well it's good to see that they haven't decided to sell out completely. After all, they are professional. Then again, this entire "supplement" is nothing more than a way to make self-published authors pay for ad space. And you know what that eerie voice in Kevin Costner's corn field says: "If you build it, they will come." (Yes, yes, the actual quote is "he will come," but you get the idea.)

And, sadly, I guarantee self-published authors will come in droves with their wallets open.

* * *

In other news, I've added a new widget to the sidebar of upcoming appearances for the Hint Fiction anthology's release. The Vroman's and McNally Jackson events I've mentioned already, but there will also be an event at the Big Blue Marble Bookstore in Philadelphia on Friday, November 19. I have also been asked to speak at the Morgantown Poets gathering on Thursday, December 16; this is in Morgantown, West Virgina for anyone close by. And there will most likely be something around my area on Monday, November 1st, but nothing has been decided yet. Once I get a full list of anthology contributors attending each event, I'll make an official announcement.

* * *

The Los Angeles Review's fiction editor Stefanie Freele asked me to do a blog post for their website. I wrote a little something called "Our Best Work" and you can read it here.

* * *

You're probably wondering why I'm blogging when I said I wouldn't be for awhile. Well, that Publishers Weekly thing really ticked me off for starters. Work on the Y.A. book is coming along nicely, and I'm on the downswing, really getting momentum, so it would make sense that I would have to put off writing for a few days. This Wednesday I'll be headed to Las Vegas; my brother-in-law is getting married so my wife and I will be there for a few days to attend, and I'm not about to take my laptop along with the intention of continuing to work on the book. I mean, I could take my laptop, but we all know I wouldn't get any writing done.

So ... yeah, that's about it. Hope everyone's doing well. I must now go rewatch The Hangover in anticipation for this week. I wonder if they have some kind of bus tour dedicated to the movie. It wouldn't surprise me if they did.

A Scam Hiding In Plain Sight

I think I may have mentioned this on Twitter awhile back, but I came across this again and wanted to post it here. Basically, a recent trend in small press anthologies have this kind of payment:

Editor's Favorites Authors of the editor's top 3 favorite stories will receive the following payment: 1st Place - $50.00 + 1 contributor's copy of the book 2nd Place - $25.00 + 1 contributor's copy of the book 3rd Place - $10.00 + 1 contributor's copy of the book

All other authors will receive EXPOSURE ONLY (no payment, no contributor's copy)

Anyone see anything wrong with that? I understand how hard it is for publishers, how there's very little money to fund a project, and if there is very little money to fund a project, maybe some of these publishers should be think twice before announcing such a project.

It's always nice to get paid for my writing, but sometimes I'm happy with taking just a contributor's copy if one is available. But why would I submit to an anthology that only pays three of its contributors with money and a copy of the book and doesn't give any of the other contributors anything? (Keep in mind that this is an anthology that will probably be read by hardly anyone else besides the contributors.) It's like the writers submitting are participating in a lottery, though not a fair lottery. Because it wouldn't surprise me if the top three stories happened to be awarded to somewhat more established writers (thought I can't imagine many somewhat more established writers would submit to these types of projects in the first place).

Basically, the horror/sf community frowns upon markets that don't pay. So some of these publishers have found a loophole. They will only pay three of the contributors, so they can still be considered a "paying market." And yet ... and yet ... writers will still submit to them.

But as they say, such is life.

Talking In Circles

It is clear that many methods of traditional publishing are undergoing seismic shifts. The notion of self-publishing does not carry the same stigma it did just a few years ago. Yet there is a danger in self-publishing that becomes clear when you compare these two authors, and how they got to where they are. I wonder, with the incredible ease in which authors can now publish their rejected manuscripts online, whether fewer authors are going to take the time to hone their craft, get good at what they do, and achieve their full potential. Will new technology stifle budding talent?

-- Jason Pinter on the "Konrath" Effect

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a little sick and tired hearing the same old bitchfest about how print publishing is dying and how electronic publishing is the way of the future and everyone needs to accept it now and you might as well self-publish your work because nobody else will publish it for you and blah blah blah.

While I don't agree with everything Mr. Pinter says in his article, I find the comments to the article completely fascinating in one of those "Oh my God I can't believe I'm actually wasting my time reading this" sort of ways. Basically, the commenters are people who don't fully understand publishing but think they do and getting in arguments with others who don't fully understand publishing but think they do. Here's a taste of the inane babbling:

Traditional publishing can't die soon enough for me. They've screwed good authors over for decades and now writers are finding ways to circumvent this closed, inbred world. Sure it means a bunch of crappy writers will put a bunch of drivel out there, but I guarantee that there will be literary gems that are self-published too. The jig is up, and traditional publishers' game is almost over. Hooray.

Look, I'm not saying I know all the ins and outs of publishing, but I know enough not to get into pointless debates over it. The fact is yes, ebooks are coming into their own. Does this mean print publishers will disappear? No. While before publishers were very fickle in which books they published, they'll become even more so now. But publishing is publishing -- it will never go away. It might downsize some, but you will still have some kind of major publishers around publishing the big-name authors and taking chances on no-name authors. And then you'll have places like Amazon who will sign on authors exclusively (think of it like the iPhone -- if you want to use the iPhone in the United States, you have to go to AT&T no matter how much you might not want to; the same applies here, so if readers want to read a certain author's work, they must purchase it from a certain store, i.e. Amazon).

There are many different writers out there, and just because self-publishing is now only a few clicks away doesn't mean those writers with great talent and potential who want to have their books distributed in major bookstores are simply going to give up after a couple rejections. No, they're going to keep writing and submitting and who knows, maybe it won't happen, maybe it will, but they're nothing like the other kind of writer who gives up after a few rejections or who maybe decides that they don't even need to try to begin with and just self-publishes their book right away. (Yes, yes, you have uploaded fifty novels into the Kindle Store, good for you, but how many of those books have actually sold and are being read by people other than your family?)

Let's face it -- Konrath has certainly set a precedent by signing with Amazon. What's more, that one kind of writer will see this as an inspiration and figure, hey, I can do the same thing. Only it's not that simple. I mean, Stephenie Meyer is making millions of dollars off her books, but that doesn't mean I'm working on a bunch of different vampire novels right now. What works for one writer isn't going to work for another -- hell, it probably won't work at all.

Writers write. Or at least that's what they're supposed to do. How much actual quality writing can writers get done while arguing with other writers in comment sections of articles (published at The Huffington Post no less!)? If these writers worried more about their own books and learning to become better writers they wouldn't have to bitch and moan how nobody wants to publish them so they're going to publish themselves and make lots and lots of money like Konrath.

But hey, that's just me. What the hell do I know?

Beatrice & Virgil & Ripped Off Readers

Last month Erin Fitzgerald was kind enough to send me a copy of Beatrice and Virgil, Yann Martel's latest self-proclaimed masterpiece. Here is the author himself telling you what it's about (don't mind that he comes off as a massive douche; he's just very successful):

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYZH2drbfR8

Last year the New York Times reported that Yann Martel got a $3 million deal for the book:

After a monthlong auction Spiegel & Grau, an imprint of Random House, one of the world’s largest publishers, bought the rights to publish Mr. Martel’s third novel, as yet untitled, in the United States sometime next year. Like “Life of Pi,” the new book is an allegory — this time about the Holocaust — involving animals. It relates the story of an encounter between a famous writer and a taxidermist who is writing a play that features dialogue between a donkey and a monkey, both imprinted on a shirt.

Of course, in the article Martel declined to talk about his advance, saying, “Frankly, with all the years it took to write this book, if you amortize it out, it’s not as much as one would like it to be.”

Uh-huh. But here's the thing. The book itself is about 200 pages. With the font size and layout, I'd be surprised if the word count is anywhere over 60,000 words. So yes, it took him over seven years to write that many words, but the sad part? Not many of those words are very good. You'd think if the publisher was paying him close to $3 million (which, let's be honest here, is a nice chunk of change) they might -- oh, I don't know -- have an editor actually go through the MS and fix it up. And who knows, maybe they did, but the book I read felt like it had been written by a high school student -- and not even an above average high school student.

Also, there are seven pages of Beatrice and Virgil discussing what a pear is. Seven pages!!! I'll admit, I skimmed most of this book, and I'm glad I did. The main problem I had with the story is that the author tries to play up this great mystery of what the taxidermist's play is supposed to mean, while almost every reader going into the book already knows it's supposed to be about the Holocaust. That's like going to see The Sixth Sense already knowing that Bruce Willis is dead (sorry if I spoiled that for anyone; if I did, watch Stir of Echoes instead, it's a much better film).

The book has gotten panned pretty much everywhere. This makes me happy for some strange reason. In fact, the only reason I had any desire to even crack open the book was because of how bad it was supposed to be. And you know what? It's even worse than they say. I recommend everyone read it just to see how bad it is. I'm going to be talking more in depth about negative reviews sometime later, but for now, here's how Martel deals with them (notice how he compares himself to Tolstoy, Shakespeare, and Dante):