Agents and publishers have very different ideas about what royalties for eBooks should be. Agents think that 50% is a fair royalty, while publishers think that 25% is a fair royalty. This finding is according to research from Mike Shatzkin, CEO of the Idea Logical Company and Constance Sayre, principal at Market Partners International. The two presented their survey at the Digital Book World conference yesterday afternoon. Despite the discrepancy, a third of agents claim to have negotiated deals for 50% royalty rates. According to Sayre, a few years ago Random House was offering a 50% royalty rate which may have influenced these numbers.
I find it interesting that "publishers aren't scared" about authors self-publishing. Maybe that's just big talk and they're actually terrified. An advance is always nice, yes, but the larger the advance, the less chance the author will ever see royalties. In fact, most publishers are making their advances pretty modest these days. So 50% royalties on e-books? I do like the sound of that. 25%? No so much. Because 25% on a high-priced e-book isn't going to make you hardly anything; even 50% on a high-priced e-book isn't going to make you a lot if the sales aren't there. It's looking like authors and publishers may be headed toward an ultimate showdown. The question is, who is who in this clip:
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t2GgN_RC7M